Skip to content
WikiAnalyst

Wikipedia page repair, editing and creation

We are Wikipedia editors for people and companies. We create pages that meet Wikipedia's standards, fix pages that have been deleted, tagged or damaged, and look after them afterwards, working from published sources and through Wikipedia's own processes.

A claret spiral staircase seen from below, rising to a round skylight

Why a failed attempt is hard to undo

Wikipedia keeps a public record of every edit, discussion and decision, and the editors who review a page read that record before they read the page. A first attempt made without knowing the rules often makes the second attempt harder, and sometimes impossible without an administrator's agreement.

What a failed attempt leaves behind
  1. Deletion discussions are kept forever

    Every Articles for Deletion debate is archived on a public page. The arguments, the votes and the administrator's closing statement are there for every future reviewer to read.

  2. A title can be locked against recreation

    When a page is deleted and recreated repeatedly, administrators can create-protect the title, informally called salting. At the highest level only an administrator can then create it, and they will want a strong case.

  3. Reposts can be deleted on sight

    A page substantially the same as one deleted after discussion can be removed under speedy deletion criterion G4, with no new debate.

  4. Accounts carry their history

    An undisclosed paid editor, or several accounts used by one person, can be blocked. Sockpuppet investigations are public and are linked from the accounts involved.

  5. Declined drafts stay on file

    Each declined submission at Articles for Creation leaves the reviewer's reason on the draft. Repeated resubmission without real change can lead to the draft being rejected outright.

How we approach a page

Every engagement starts with analysis, not editing. Most problems on Wikipedia are explained by something already in the page's record, and the right fix depends on finding it.

A table lamp lit on a desk in the evening
  1. Read the record

    Revision history, talk page and archives, deletion and protection logs, previous drafts and any discussion about the subject elsewhere on Wikipedia.

  2. Test the sources

    We check what independent, reliable coverage exists, because that decides what a page can say and whether it can exist at all.

  3. Choose the right route

    Direct edit, edit request, deletion review, Articles for Creation or a noticeboard. The wrong route is the most common reason good changes fail.

  4. Follow through

    We stay with the discussion until it is resolved, then keep watch on the page so that a new problem is caught early.

How we work

Guides

Detailed explanations of Wikipedia's processes, written for the people they affect. Each one links to the policies it describes.

All guides

Questions people ask

Do you only fix pages, or do you create them too?

We do both, and everything in between: new pages, edits and updates to existing ones, repair after deletion or tagging, edit requests and disputes, ongoing monitoring and translation. Most of our guides deal with pages in trouble because that is where people most need precise information, but a large share of our work is creating pages properly the first time.

Can you guarantee a page will be kept or a tag removed?

No, and nobody honest can. Wikipedia's volunteer editors and administrators make those decisions under published policies. What we control is the quality of the case: the sources, the drafting, the timing and the route used. That is what decides most outcomes.

Why not just fix it myself?

You can, and for a single factual correction with a good source it may be enough. The risk is that Wikipedia keeps a permanent public record of everything: edits, deletion discussions, declined drafts, blocked accounts. A poorly judged attempt is visible to every reviewer who looks at the page afterwards, and some outcomes, such as a title being protected against recreation, are hard to undo.

How quickly can you act on a deletion discussion?

Deletion discussions normally run for seven days, so speed matters. Send us the link and we will review the discussion and the sources the same working day where we can, and tell you plainly whether there is a case worth making.

What does a page health check include?

A written review of the page as it stands: its revision history, talk page, deletion and protection logs, the tags on it and why they were added, the quality of its sources, and the realistic options. It is free and carries no obligation.

Not sure what has happened to your page?

Send us the page name. We read its history, talk page and logs, and reply with a plain account of where it stands and what can realistically be done. No charge and no obligation.